Filtrer par
Chercheurs et collaborateurs
Inventaires
Union des consommateurs, La justice en ligne comme solution aux barrières à l'accès à la justice ? , Rapport final, (2022).
Riikka Koulu, Havu, K. & Hirvonen, H., Regulating AI is the current legislation capable of dealing with AI? , Finnish Centre for Artificial Intelligence | Publié
Riikka KOULU, Human control over automation: EU policy and AI ethics , European Journal of Legal Studies 1/2020 pp. 9-46. | Publié
Riika KOULU, Proceduralising control and discretion: human oversight in artificial intelligence policy , Maastricht Journal for European and Comparative Law, 2020 | Publié
Riika KOULU, Crafting digital transparency: implementing legal values into algorithmic design , Critical Analysis of Law , April 2021 | Publié
Riikka KOULU, Laura KONTIAINEN, Suvi SANKARI, Shift the perspective and see differently: Access to justice as a boundary object for interdisciplinary algorithm studies , submitted in 2022, under review in Frontiers in Computer Science | Publié
Giampiero Lupo, Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: Normative Frameworks and the Risks Related to AI in the Judiciary , Technologies of Normalization, Sep.-Oct. 2020.
Giampiero LUPO, Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: Normative Frameworks and the Risks Related to AI in the Judiciary , ACT Workshop, Nov. 2020.
Giampiero LUPO, Risky Artificial Intelligence: What the Role of Accidents will be in the Path to AI Regulation , Condition Critical: Disruption, disaster and the challenges to law, Online seminar, Sep.-Oct 2021.
Giampiero LUPO, Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: How Normative Frameworks Protect Citizens from the Risks Related to AI Use in the Judiciary , European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 8(2), 75-96, 2019. | Publié
Giampiero LUPO, The ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An analysis of ethical frameworks disciplining AI in justice and other contexts of application , Oñati Socio-legal Series (ISSN 2079-5971), 2022 | Publié
Amy SALYZYN, Legal Technology: Tools and Regulatory Responses , Virtual Presentation to Law Society of Ontario, Technology Taskforce, October 23, 2019
Amy SALYZYN, Judging by Numbers: How Will Judicial Analytics Impact the Justice System and Its Stakeholders? , Canadian Association for Legal Ethics Annual Conference, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie, October 23, 2020
Jena MCGILL et Amy SALYZYN, Judging by Numbers: How will judicial analytics impact the justice system and its stakeholders? , 44:1 (2021) Dalhousie Law Journal 250. | Publication à venir
Kayla BURRIS, Taylor LAIN, Kazia NOWACKI & Fredric LEDERER, Modern Frenemies: Lawyers and Legal AI | Publication à venir
Annotated Bibliography: Direct-to-Public Legal Services – Impact Evaluation , 2020, 200 pages | Publié
Inventory of A2J Author Technology in USA , 2019, 15 pages | Publié
Amy, SCHMITZ | List of ODR providers | Publié
Aidin RASTI, From legal contracts to smart contracts: An Xtext editor for Symboleo with a code generator for Hyperledger Fabric , Demonstration, CASCON x EVOKE 2021, online, Canada, November 24, 2021. | Publication à venir
Daniel AMYOT, Alireza PARVIZIMOSAED, A., John MYLOPOULOS, Mylopoulos, CyPreSS ORF: The Symboleo Project , Invited presentation, CASCON x EVOKE Workshop on Software Techniques for Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems, online, Canada, November 25, 2021. | Publication à venir
Symboleo-CC: a Symboleo legal contract specification verification tool built around the nuXmv model checking tool
Symboleo-IDE: an Eclipse editor for the Symboleo language, with JavaScript code generator for smart contracts on the Hyperledger Fabric platform
The Symboleo language ontology, with corresponding code in EMF, Umple and Java
Daniel AMYOT, Symboleo: a language for specifying/verifying legal contracts and generating smart contracts , Seminar presentation, École Polytechnique, Canada, April 14, 2022. | Publication à venir
Daniel AMYOT, Contract Specification and Verification: Experience with the Symboleo Language , Keynote presentation, 15th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontologies (VMBO 2021), online, Italy, March 5, 2021. | Publication à venir
Daniel AMYOT, Contract specification and verification: Experience with the Symboleo language , Séminaire, LATECE, UQAM, online, Canada, May 19, 2021. | Publication à venir
Alberto LOPES, Languages for Legal Contract Specifications . | Publication à venir
Sepehr SHARIFI, Smart Contracts: From Formal Specification to Blockchain Code , Master thesis , UOttawa, 2020. | Publication à venir
Pre-Conflict Decisions Tools: Orienting Litigants and Defendants: Review of Literature | Publié
Enquête sur la littérature | Inventaire des outils d’intelligence artificielle favorisant la prévention des conflits pour les citoyens | Publié
Tomas VAZQUEZ ROJAS, Algorithmes et administration publique , 2021,18 p., document de travail n°29.
Alexandra PASCA, Fabien GÉLINAS (dir.), Inventory of A2J Author Technology in USA , document de travail, Chantier 8, 2021
Laboratoire de Cyberjustice (dir.), Numéro spécial : Droit algorithmique , Revue Lex Electronica, (2020).
Kate ROBERTSON, Cynthia KHOO, Yolanda SONG (dir.), To Surveil and Predict : a Human Rights Analysis of Algorithmic Policing in Canada , The Citizen Lab, University of Toronto Faculty of Law, (2020).
Option consommateur (dir.), Projet de loi n° 64 – Loi modernisant des dispositions législatives en matière de protection des renseignements personnels (mémoire d'Option consommateur) , (2020).
Karine GENTELET, Alexandra BAHARY-DIONNE (dir.), Les angles morts des réponses technologiques à la pandémie de COVID-19 : Disjonction entre les inégalités en santé et numériques structurantes de la marginalisation de certaines populations , OBVIA, (2020).
Winkler Institute (dir.), Winkler Institute for Dispute Resolution ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 , rapport annuel, (2020).
Option Consommateurs (dir.), Les mécanismes de règlement des différends proposés par les plateformes de l’économie du partage. Des outils efficaces pour l’accès à la justice? Rapport de recherche - Accès à la Justice, (2020).
Laboratoire de cyberjustice (dir.), Les solutions informatiques mises en œuvre dans le cadre de la gestion de la conformité juridique, spécialement dans les secteurs bancaire, financier et des assurances (Regulatory Technologies ou RegTech) , Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, (2018).
Thomas Clay (dir.), L’arbitrage en ligne , Commission ad hoc, Rapport du club des Juristes, France : Paris, École de droit de la Sorbonne, (2019).
Lisa MOORE, Trevor C.W FARROW (dir.), Investir dans la justice: revue de littérature en faveur de la nécessité d'en améliorer l'accès, rapport préparé pour le Groupe de travail sur la justice Toronto: Forum canadien sur la justice civile , Forum canadien sur la justice civile, (2019).
Fabien GÉLINAS (dir.), Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the work of its thirty-fifth session , United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, (2018).
David RESTREPO AMARILES (dir.), Conclusion from the International Seminar on Administrative Law and Artificial Intelligence , Centro de Estudios Europeos, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, (2019).
Valentin CALLIPEL, Karl BRANTING L, Les JACOBS et Trevor FARROW (dir.), Inventaire des outils d'intelligence artificielle favorisant la prévention des conflits pour les citoyens , inventaire chantier 1 AJC, Laboratoire de cyberjustice, (2018).
Meredith ROSSNER, Martha MCCURDY (dir.), Video Hearings Process Evaluation (Phase 2) Final Report , rapport, London School of Economics, (2020).
Benoit DUPONT, Yuan STEVENS, Hannes WESTERMANN, Michael JOYCE (dir.), Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Crime and Criminal Justice , Korean Institute of Criminology, Canada Research Chair in Cybersecurity, ICCC, Université de Montréal, (2018).
Lisa MOORE, Trevor FARROW (dir.), Investir dans la justice: revue de littérature en faveur de la nécessité d'améliorer l'accès , Groupe de travail sur la justice Toronto: Forum canadien sur la justice civile, (2019).
Groupe de travail 3: Gouvernance et politiques Chantier 14 – Increase the intelligibility of online dockets and access to justice by mobilizing artificial intelligence Chantier 14 – Towards a synergetic approach to the dematerialization of judicial files: protection of the privacy of the litigant as a vector of access to justice Chantier 15 – Enjeux sécuritaires des outils utilisant l’IA