Law-jobs in the Algorithmic Society

This content is not available in the selected language.

It is now well established that algorithms are transforming our economy, institutions, social relations, and ultimately our society. This article explores the question — what is the role of law in the algorithmic society? We draw on the law-jobs theory of Karl Llewellyn and on William’s Twining refinement of Llewellyn’s work through the perspective of a thin functionalism to have a better understanding of what law does in this new context. We highlight the emergence of an algorithmic law, as law performs jobs such as the disposition of trouble-cases, the preventive channeling and reorientation of conduct and expectations, and the allocation of authority in the face of algorithmic systems. We conclude that the law-jobs theory remains relevant to understand the role of law in the algorithmic society, but it is also challenged by how algorithms redefine who does or should do what law-jobs, and how they are done.

This content has been updated on 30 July 2024 at 15 h 48 min.